• Transparency needs to be ensured in LNG terminal deal
  • Discrimination against char dwellers
  • London Olympic 2012
  • Latin America's new left in power
  • Sylhet divisional theatre fest ends
  • There is ‘serious lack’ in the government machinery
  • JS panel snubs BTCL for poor performance
  • Lucky Enam directs yet another theatre on biranganas
  • 80 lakh bank accounts of farmers remain inactive
  • India restores power, minister promises action
  • Police tell Team Anna to hospitalise fasting activists
  • Emotional Phelps makes history
  • ‘Blade Runner’ awaits Olympic debut
  • British citizen die after being injured by husband
  • Shops, restaurants fined for selling unsafe foods
  • Another public agricultural university to be set up: PM
  • Action against offending house owners ordered
  • Delhi submits memo to Hague court
  • BUET teachers postpone movement
  • Mobile courts continue drive against food adulteration
  • Govt decided to allow more fuel oil-run power plants
HOME  EDITORIAL
  
Print Friendly and PDF

Transparency needs to be ensured in LNG terminal deal



That Petrobangla — the state-sponsored corporation to explore and extract oil, gas and mineral resources — is likely to award the contract for building a floating LNG terminal at Moheskhali in the Bay of Bengal to a US company —Astra Oil and Excelerate Energy — without knowing the company’s investment and technical details in particular is unacceptable. According to a New Age report on Wednesday, even an Energy Division official termed ‘incomplete’ the company’s proposals on which Petrobangla gave a presentation on Monday. Besides, as he is quoted to have commented further, the facilities the firm sought, including an equipment procurement contact fee and credit support, are not clear. Notably, with an acute shortage of gas, the incumbent government decided to import liquefied natural gas soon after it had assumed office in 2009 to ensure adequate gas supply, especially, to the power plants and industries in Chittagong. Accordingly, Petrobangla floated a tender in November 2010 to build the terminal with the capacity to handle five million tonnes of LNG a year, convert LNG into 500 million cubic feet gas a day and complete berthing and mooring facilities for ships carrying LNG. Also, it short-listed four out of 10 international companies, including the one in question that submitted expressions of interests in 2011. However, none of the four companies responded to the following call made by Petobangla seeking the submission of their bids for the construction of the terminal although the latter deferred the bid submission date four times that year. Apparently, the firms thought that it would be impossible to complete the project in the stipulated one year and a half. Meanwhile, Petrobangla reportedly later went through ‘a long negotiation process’ to find the firm at hand ‘qualified.’
It is beyond debate that the country has to have the LNG project, which is crucial for not only easing its mounting energy crisis but also diversifying its energy sources, as soon as possible. But it is also true that the whole process involving the project must be done in a transparent and efficient manner. It is all the more important as the selection of the firm to be tasked with the implementation of the project is critical for ensuring consumers at least affordable service from the project. It cannot be denied that the energy sector deemed lucrative by the international companies have so far found a number of deals which have given rise to questions among the conscious quarters at large, not to mention experts. Not only that, some of those dubious projects had to face even huge public protests in recent years.
The top brass of Petrobangla are well advised to address the concerns already raised before awarding the company the huge contract. At the same time, the government also needs to oversee the matter to dispel any controversy over the deal.
 



Reader’s Comment

comments powered by Disqus
   
    Thursday, August 2, 2012

Online Poll


Do you agree with the World Bank that there was ‘no legal reason to exclude former communications minister’ Syed Abul Hossain from the Anti-Corruption Commission’s investigation list?

  • Yes
  • No
  • No comment
Ajax Loader

Archives

Select MonthYear

June 2013

SunMonTueWedThuFri Sat
01
02030405060708
09101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30