Both official media and the opposition branded as a failure a world powers deal on a transition plan for Syria as at least 21 people were reported killed Sunday in violence nationwide.
The latest violence follows a deadly Saturday when at least 120 people died across the country.
World powers meeting in Geneva on Saturday agreed a transition plan that could include current regime members, but the West did not see any role for the president, Bashar al-Assad, in a new unity government.
Russia and China insisted that Syrians themselves must decide how the transition happens, rather than allow others to dictate their fate.
Moscow and Beijing, which have twice blocked UN Security Council resolutions on Syria, both signed up to the final agreement that did not make any explicit call for Assad to cede power.
Official Syrian media and the opposition Local Coordination Committees group demonstrated rare agreement in slamming the outcome.
The meeting ‘failed,’ trumpeted Al-Baath, newspaper of the ruling party.
‘The agreement of the task force on Syria in Geneva on Saturday resembles an enlarged meeting of the UN Security Council where the positions of participants remained the same,’ it said.
The LCC, which organises protests on the ground in Syria, said the outcome showed once again the failure to adopt a common position.
It called the transition accord ‘just one version, different in form only, of the demands of Russian leaders allied to the Assad regime and who cover it militarily and politically in the face of international pressure.’
Burhan Ghalioun, a senior member and former head of the opposition Syrian National Council, told pan-Arab television Al-Arabiya that ‘this is the worst international statement yet to emerge from talks on Syria.’
According to the SNC’s official Facebook page, he described the plan as a ‘farce.’
Ghalioun called a ‘mockery’ the notion that Syrians should negotiate with ‘their executioner, who has not stopped killing, torturing... and raping women for 16 months.’
SNC spokeswoman Basma Qadmani said in Ankara there were some ‘positive elements’ in the deal, although ‘important elements remain too ambiguous... and the plan is too vague to foresee real and immediate action.’
‘The first one is that the final declaration says that the participants agree to say that the Assad family cannot rule the country any more, and therefore the Assad family cannot lead the transition period.’
‘The second positive element is the agreement that the transition should comply with the legitimate aspirations of Syrian people.
‘For us this means that Assad should go because Syrian people have already said that they want Assad to go.’
Iran, a strong ally of Assad, echoed similar sentiment, saying the Geneva meeting was ‘unsuccessful’ because both Syria and Iran were note invited.
‘This meeting was unsuccessful... because Syria was not present and some influential nations were not present,’ Iran’s deputy foreign minister for Arab-African Affairs Hossein Amir Abdolahian told state television.
The United States and European nations reportedly opposed the presence of Iran, although UN-Arab League envoy Kofi Annan and the UN chief, Ban Ki-moon, had wanted Tehran to attend.
The Geneva deal came despite initial pessimism about the prospects of the talks amid deep divisions between the West and China and Russia on how to end the violence that the Observatory says has killed more than 15,800 since March 2011.