• Another dangerous precedent
  • Another pointer on incumbents’ indifference to stopping river pollution
  • Miners struggle in Spain while the rich spoil
  • Agricultural growth versus food security and safe-food security
  • Our Muslim brothers
  • Deadlock in Ashulia industrial belt
  • Tagore dance fest inaugurated
  • Seminar, music presented
  • Bangladesh not yet ready to give India transit: Quader
  • Businesses want separate industrial park for light engineering sector
  • Tensions soar ahead of Egypt poll result
  • Tensions with Turkey simmer as Assad retains old guard
  • Ashraful shows rare consistency
  • Four-star Germans blast Greeks
  • Water stagnation acute in Sylhet city
  • Government to implement TRM with people’s consent
  • Utilities to seek power price increase today
  • German FM hopes killing of ‘activists’ to be probed
  • Apparel workers rally for wage increase at Ashulia
  • Bapex hits less prospective gas reserve at Srikail
  • Principal sent into forced leave for caning students
  • AL front leader killed
HOME  EDITORIAL
  
Print Friendly and PDF

Another dangerous precedent



The frequency with which the incumbent Awami League-Jatiya Party government, through the local civil administration, has been employing the ordering of Section 144 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, which bans unlawful assembly, to stop opposition parties and other organisations holding rallies and other programmes, is indeed a case of setting extremely bad political precedents. According to a report front-paged in New Age on Saturday, the government has so far imposed Section 144 a staggering 407 times since they came to power in January 2009, till May this year. Moreover, the use of Section 144 has been on a steep and gradual rise, with it being used 82 times in 2009, 114 times in 2010, 133 times in 2011 and 78 times only in the first five months of this year. Predictably almost every time the Section 144 was ordered, it was to foil an opposition political programme. According to opposition politicians, every time an opposition party announces programmes at a place, the ruling party or its front organisations deliberately also announces programmes there at the same time, allowing the administration to impose Section 144 on the grounds of saving people from possible damage to life and property. This is in fact a sinister ploy on the part of the government, to deprive the opposition of their constitutionally-guaranteed right to assemble and protest, which can spiral into more devious schemes in the future. It is against the spirit of rule of law, to which the government has professed allegiance to, it is undemocratic and a violation of the people’s right to freedom of speech and expression contained in the constitution.    
The incumbents, ever since they assumed power, have not just shown a powerful streak of intolerance towards all kinds of dissenting voices, but have also, more grievously, shown a propensity to use various sections of the law, to stifle oppositional voices of the sort. The use of mobile courts to mete out arbitrary punishment to pro-hartal activists is one such example of the kind. Ever since the incumbents began employing it to send hundreds and thousands of street political activists, as well as opposition leaders, to jail on various lengths of terms, it has received criticism from various sections, who deem it essentially undemocratic and against the spirit of justice and rule of law. However, the government, till this day, continues to use it, to great effectiveness on their behalf. Likewise, the imposition of Section 144 to foil opposition programmes, so far employed  consistently yet almost un-scrutinised, is another dangerous weapon which reflects rather appallingly the regard with which the incumbents treat their professed allegiance to rule of law. 
It must however be noted that the previous BNP-led government had resorted to many such mechanisms of twisting the law to make partisan gains or stifle the opposition. In fact, it is common phenomenon for one party, while in power, to discover a new mean to undermine the opposition, and for the other to take many steps further when they get their turn in power. This is, put plainly, a disturbing, sickening and dangerous trend. If the incumbents have any regard for democracy, the country’s constitution and people’s rights guaranteed through it, than it must immediately stop such deliberate twisting of laws to suppress and repress the opposition. 



Reader’s Comment

comments powered by Disqus
   
    Sunday, June 24, 2012

Online Poll


Do you think it is justified for the scheduled banks to be reluctant to recruit women as they think that female staff will need to be given maternity leave and transport facilities?

  • Yes
  • No
  • No comment
Ajax Loader

Archives

Select MonthYear

June 2013

SunMonTueWedThuFri Sat
01
02030405060708
09101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30