• Polytechnics can become a driving force for development
  • Immediate relocation of people exposed to landslides called for
  • The butt of the joke
  • ‘Mama Bird’ will fly no more
  • Police and insecurity
  • Is this the future we want?
  • Israel overplaying Iran issue
  • Artist Safiuddin Ahmed recalled
  • Dalchhut rocks at IGCC
  • No alternative but to boost China military ties: US
  • Rebels kill 14 Syrian soldiers
  • 9-month fund outflow bigger than FDI inflow
  • Call money market for Islamic banking starts operation today
  • Prime down Abahani
  • Muktis thump Brothers
  • Poor healthcare hits RMCH
  • 3 construction workers die in city
  • Political considerations to dominate next budget
  • US plans more warships in Asia
  • Mob attacks whip Wahab’s motorcade
  • Age limit for persons with disabilities up by 2 years
  • REHAB, BLDA demand land, matching facilities from govt
  • National Committee wants block allocation for power sector
HOME  INTERNATIONAL
  
Print Friendly and PDF

No alternative but to boost China military ties: US

Agence France-Presse . Singapore

There is ‘no other alternative’ for the United States and China but to boost military-to-military relations to manage disputes, US defence secretary Leon Panetta said on Saturday.
A robust security dialogue between the two powers is key to the prosperity of the Asia-Pacific region, Panetta told delegates to the Shangri-La Dialogue, a security conference held in Singapore annually.
‘Our relationship with China — we approach it in a very clear-eyed way. We are not naive about the relationship and neither is China,’ he said in response to a question after a speech.
‘We both understand the differences we have, we both understand the conflicts we have but we also both understand that there really is no other alternative but for both of us to engage and to improve our communications and to improve our military-to-military relationship.’
Panetta said there will be ‘ups and downs’ along the way but it was vital to keep the lines of communication open.
‘It’s to build that kind of relationship recognising that we are going to have disputes... that we are going to have conflicts but also recognising that it is in the interest of both China and the United States to resolve these issues in a peaceful way,’ he said.
‘That’s the only key to advancing their prosperity and to advancing our prosperity.’
Before arriving in Singapore on Friday, Panetta told reporters aboard his plane that he had come away encouraged about the state of the US-China security dialogue after recent talks with his Chinese counterpart and other officials.
He said both powers must go beyond the mutual distrust that often characterised relations in the past.
‘I think what both of us have to recognise is that we are powers in this region. We have common interests in this region, we have common obligations to try to promote peace and prosperity and security in this region,’ he said at the Singapore summit.
Panetta told the conference Saturday the United States will shift the majority of its naval fleet to the Pacific by 2020 as part of a new strategic focus on Asia.
Amid a growing rivalry, US officials privately acknowledge that Washington’s push for a larger military footprint in the Asia Pacific is designed to back up American diplomacy when confronting Beijing’s assertive stance in the South China Sea.
But in his speech, Panetta insisted that Washington wanted dialogue with Beijing and not conflict.
‘Some view the increased emphasis by the United States on the Asia-Pacific region as some kind of challenge to China. I reject that view entirely,’ he said.
‘Our effort to renew and intensify our involvement in Asia is fully compatible... with the development and growth of China. Indeed, increased US involvement in this region will benefit China as it advances our shared security and prosperity for the future.’



Reader’s Comment

comments powered by Disqus
   
    Sunday, June 3, 2012

Online Poll


Do you think it is justified for the scheduled banks to be reluctant to recruit women as they think that female staff will need to be given maternity leave and transport facilities?

  • Yes
  • No
  • No comment
Ajax Loader

Archives

Select MonthYear

June 2013

SunMonTueWedThuFri Sat
01
02030405060708
09101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30