• ‘Milestone’ indeed, of govt’s moral bankruptcy
  • Effective steps against extortion at ferry terminals needed
  • The IMF-ECF loan: a bitter pill to swallow
  • ‘Suranjit Sengupta sets a precedent’
  • ‘A land of conspiracies’
  • What the laws of war allow
  • Environmental Theatre features 1971
  • Gallery Chitrak displays prints of top artists
  • Syria says wants only small, ‘neutral’ truce mission
  • Sudan, South Sudan clash on new front
  • Only 45pc of ADP implemented in nine months
  • IMF further cuts Bangladesh GDP growth forecast
  • Shortage of doctors hampers healthcare
  • Dhaka AdFest on June 9
  • No headway in tour plan
  • Salahuddin faces four-way battle
  • Teachers’ strike continue at BUET for 11th day
  • Five economic zones to be set up
  • BNP leader Elias goes missing
  • Left leaders, civic groups resent Suranjit’s retention as minister
  • Industrial production at stake
  • HC assigns RAB to probe Sagar-Runi killings
HOME  LETTERS
  
Print Friendly and PDF

‘Suranjit Sengupta sets a precedent’



I appreciate Sheikh Monirul’s Islam’s sentiments about Suranjit Sengupta’s resignation (New Age, April 18). However, the resignation should be seen in its proper context.
Suranjit has offered no satisfactory explanation and has instead alleged a conspiracy by the opposition party. He should have demanded investigation of the matter by the Anti-Corruption Commission instead of saying it could act if it wished. He has harangued reporters when he volunteered to answer their questions. His resignation came after tremendous public pressure.
This is Bangladesh. The fact is that no one is surprised that such a crime was committed in a ministry. Rather we are surprised that such a crime came to light at all. It is doubtful that he would have resigned if there had not been such a tremendous public outcry. It is likely that he resigned to stop further investigation into his own affairs. Intriguing reports have already surfaced about his son’s wealth.
None of which should deflect from the fact that it is the prime minister who appointed this man to such important roles in government. The prime minister is hardly an innocent bystander to the failures of a minister appointed by her. Her silence does not help anything or anyone.
We all crave new precedents for this beleaguered nation. But our craving should not blind us to the definition of a meaningful precedent. In Bangladesh, one of the most corrupt countries in the world, hardly any government employee or politician, under any government, has faced trial for significant corruption. Many officials and politicians are very efficient and competent at corruption. They probably think the minister has let the side down.
A precedent has been set and it is not that a minister has resigned with nobility. The precedent that has been set is that the public and the media can, when united, force a resignation.
The minister may be proven innocent and may even be reinstated. But the man who applauds the minister’s resignation is also the man who will not sign a piece of paper saying there is no significant corruption in this ministry — or any ministry.
Ezajur Rahman
Kuwait



Reader’s Comment

comments powered by Disqus
   
    Thursday, April 19, 2012

Online Poll


Do you think it is justified for the scheduled banks to be reluctant to recruit women as they think that female staff will need to be given maternity leave and transport facilities?

  • Yes
  • No
  • No comment
Ajax Loader

Archives

Select MonthYear

June 2013

SunMonTueWedThuFri Sat
01
02030405060708
09101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30