• So much for ‘Digital Bangladesh’
  • Disregard for safety all around
  • A game of regional chess over Syrian tragedy
  • ‘500MW solar electric power by 2013’
  • Student leaders
  • Hydraulic backfill with long-wall mining
  • Amending the need for an external mechanism
  • DFP makes docu on Sultana Zaman
  • Minuddin wins Best Painting Award
  • BFF set for Blatter boost
  • Cricketers unite to fight for justice
  • BCB president satisfied with Pakistan security
  • Russia, China step up Syria peace efforts
  • Death toll in Yemen attacks rises to 103
  • Textile sector faces blow as India bans cotton export
  • Free footpaths of motorbikes for pedestrians: HC
  • CNG stations closure for two more hours
  • Upazila chairmen’s pay to double
  • Voters’ roll update could be delayed
  • Women farmers deserve recognition: economists
  • EC working for nat’l polls based on EVM
HOME  MAIN NEWS
  
Print Friendly and PDF

Free footpaths of motorbikes for pedestrians: HC

Staff Correspondent

A motorcyclist rides on the footpath near the Ruposhi Bangla Hotel in Dhaka on Monday. The High Court on the day asked authorities to stop riders using footpaths.— Sony RamanyA motorcyclist rides on the footpath near the Ruposhi Bangla Hotel in Dhaka on Monday. The High Court on the day asked authorities to stop riders using footpaths.— Sony Ramany

The High Court on Monday asked the authorities to stop motorcycles on the city’s sidewalks to ensure free movement of the pedestrians.
A bench of Justice Mohammad Bazlur Rahman and Justice Md. Habibul Gani issued the directives after hearing two public interest litigation writ petitions.
Supreme Court lawyers KM Zabir and Aynunnahar Siddique filed the writ petitions in August and October challenging the legality of restriction imposed on rickshaws on several city roads without ensuring alternative modes of transportation for the commuters and without freeing the sidewalks for the pedestrians.
The court also directed Dhaka Metropolitan Police and the two newly created Dhaka city corporations to remove, in 30days, all billboards from foot-over bridges.
The petitioners said that the billboards shelter anti social elements in creating insecurity for pedestrians, particularly women and girls.
The court also asked the DMP and the two city corporations to take action to not to allow anyone to drive vehicles or ride motorcycles on footpaths.
The court directed the authorities to make zebra crossings at four points of entry into the Supreme Court.
It also directed the DMP commissioner to post adequate traffic police at the crossings.
The court directed the two city corporations to submit a detailed report providing  information on the total number of roads in the capital city fit for movement of motor vehicles as well as the number of sidewalks and foot-over bridges and zebra crossings as on March 5.
The DCCs will have to furnish a detail report on the existing projects whether it working or proposed on the public transport.
The court directed Dhaka Metropolitan Police commissioner to submit to it all the notices it had issued in one year ending on March 5 imposing restrictions on rickshaw movement on city roads.
The court directed Bangladesh Roads Transport Authority to submit an authenticated   report on the total number of registered motorized vehicles plying in the city as on March 5.      
BRTA has also been directed to submit a report on the total number of motor vehicles plying in the city specifying the routes.    
The court directed BRTA,
DMP and the two city corporations to submit the reports to it by April 10.
The court also issued a rule on the secretaries of the ministries of home and communication, the inspector general of the police, the two city corporation administrators, Rajdhani Unnayan Katripakka, BRTA, DMP commissioner, joint DMP commissioner (traffic), and DMP deputy commissioner (south) to explain in four weeks why the restriction on rickshaw movement on city roads should not be declared illegal.
It asked the respondents to explain why they should not be directed to ensure equal opportunity to all the citizens, particularly the pedestrians in using public thoroughfares and sidewalks instead of providing extra advantage to motor vehicle owners.
The respondents have also been asked to explain why they should not be directed to implement on priority if there are projects for the benefit of a majority of the commuters who do not own motor vehicles.
The court directed the authorities to explain why they should not be directed to ensure or arrange separate lanes for cycles and rickshaws on city roads and to remove all obstacles for the pedestrians in using the footpaths.
The court also directed the communication secretary to explain why he should not be directed to create a Dhaka Metropolitan Transport Authority with the responsibility to regulate, ensure and operate mass public transit system.
It also asked the authorities to explain why they would not be directed to ensure the public transportation to facilitate easy movement of the commuters in the city.
The court also asked them to explain why they should not be directed to ensure undisturbed use of the sidewalks by the pedestrians.
The court passed the orders after hearing lawyers and experts.



Reader’s Comment

comments powered by Disqus
   
    Tuesday, March 6, 2012

Online Poll


Do you agree with the opposition camp that the government’s decision to impose a one-month ban on political meetings and processions is an ‘attack on democracy’?

  • Yes
  • No
  • No comment
Ajax Loader

Archives

Select MonthYear

May 2013

SunMonTueWedThuFri Sat
01020304
05060708091011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031