by Rahnuma Ahmed

Primarily the work is aimed at giving the US Navy and the other armed forces, if they should care to use it, the capability of modifying the environment, to their own advantage, or to the disadvantage of an enemy. We regard the weather as a weapon. Anything one can use his way is a weapon and the weather is as good a one as any (emphasis added).
   
   Admiral Pier Saint-Amand, Naval Ordinance Laboratory in China Lake, California (conducted research on cloud seeding; applied in Vietnam, Cambodia). Quoted in US Senate, Subcommittee on Oceans and International Environment, July 26, 1972.
   ‘IF THE Americans cannot stop such hostile weather from devastating their own country, it will be naive to think they can play God to control the nature. By writing about controlling weather, Rahnuma Ahmed is giving Americans supernatural powers they cannot even dream of,’ thus concluded Mahmood Elahi in his letter, published in New Age on February 10.
   A serious allegation, indeed. It is my act of writing that is to blame, it is this which makes Americans powerful... In earlier times, those who delivered bad news were beheaded. I should surely consider myself fortunate.
   But I couldn’t help thinking, all those days and weeks spent in researching, in poring over official reports, crosschecking news items, watching videos, transcripting—all in vain. There was no need to engage, neither with what key US policymakers and high-up administration officials have written or said, such as Zbigniew Brzezinski and William Cohen. Nor with the European parliament’s concerns over HAARP. Nor the evidence advanced by a host of keen observers including reputable academics like Michel Chossudovsky.
    But before responding to Mr Elahi’s comments I would like to thank him for having read my piece, for having taken the trouble to comment. Acknowledging this, before pointing out areas of disagreement, is important.
   Elahi writes, blizzards, floods and hurricanes—the likes of some have never been seen before—have caused devastation in the US this year. Interestingly enough, this observation matches what Chossudovsky says when he writes, extreme and unusual weather patterns have ravaged not only the US, but every major region of the world over the last couple of years (‘Owning’ the weather?, Part 1, February 1). Based on a close and careful scrutiny of evidence, Chossudovsky goes on to argue that both the US and Russia have developed capabilities to ‘manipulate the World’s climate.’ That weather warfare, in all probability, has already started. That although global warming is important, it is highly unlikely that it is the one and only cause for these disturbances.
   Elahi assumes that I am writing about ‘control’ rather than ‘ownership’ (the two are separate concepts); from this mistaken assumption, he quickly dismisses the possibility that weather modification techniques exist. If they did, surely the Americans would have deployed them to prevent devastation in Washington DC, California, Nevada, Dakota, and southern California? Controlling nature is an act of God; for me to think otherwise—that human beings have devised techniques to control weather—is nothing short of naiveté.
   If careful research is countered with an incredulous disbelief based on commonsensical thinking, surely Americans, surely God... what else can I do but point out how some had insisted, many moons ago, if God had intended people to fly, He would surely have given them wings. But later, as we all know, aeroplanes were invented. People did fly. They still do. As for the ‘surely Americans’ argument, the idea that Americans are undivided, that both rulers and ruled work in concert for their common good... well, even stalwart supporters of the US regime have recently struggled exceedingly hard to maintain this myth. The federal bailout of Wall Street—according to Troubled Asset Relief Program estimates, $23.7 trillion—has led to immiseration and impoverishment of the majority, and to multi-million dollar bonuses for (failed)/bank executives. Surely ‘the’ Americans could have acted to prevent their country’s economic ruin?
   But I am not done with God. Not yet. HAARP watchers and analysts are persuaded that the idea that (only) God can control nature provides the perfect cover for HAARP. In this context, some even cite former American secretary of state Henry Kissinger’s assertion, expressed in policy documents: ‘depopulation’ should be the highest in US foreign policy priorities towards third world countries. Population increases harm US ‘national security’ interests; they need to be decreased by 50 per cent. ‘Progress... must be made,’ Kissinger asserts, in Bangladesh and in 12 other countries where ‘population moderation’ must be assisted (National Security Study Memorandum 200: Implications of Worldwide Population Growth for U.S. Security and Overseas Interests, 1974).
   To persuade sceptics, HAARP watchers argue: if what the former US secretary of defence William Cohen had said was true, that eco-terrorists can alter the climate, that they can remotely set off earthquakes and volcanoes through the use of electromagnetic waves, it is difficult to believe that the American government, more so, the American military has stayed away from developing these techniques. The US armed forces, in the words of Admiral Pier Saint-Amand quoted above, regards ‘the weather as a weapon.’
   The idea of weaponising weather was enabled through patenting technology invented by Bernard Eastlund, a physicist, in the 1980s, of which has been said, ‘when eventually disclosed, [it] will render many of Albert Einstein’s innovations obsolete.’ Eastlund’s patents have been sealed under a US Secrecy Order. His discovery involves beaming high frequency and extremely high frequency waves, of extremely high power, directly at a point on the ionosphere which becomes heated as a result of the accumulating electrical energy. One might think of it as ‘cooking’ the ionosphere.
   How does HAARP (High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program) work? The most easily understood explanation that I have come across, developed for lay persons, describes it thus: The site, officially located in Gakona, Alaska, consists of a collection of antennae, arranged in a computer-controlled grid, known as a ‘phased array’ which has the ability to focus radio signals in a precise direction, without turning the antennae. The phased array is not a radar but it uses some of the same extremely high frequencies to focus a powerful radio beam to specific locations in the Earth’s ionosphere. The latter is a highly charged layer of atmosphere (particles or ‘ions’) about 60 miles above surface which reflects shortwave radio waves. EHF waves are much shorter than short waves, they are said to propagate along the ‘line of sight’, retaining their strength over long distances, much like the antenna of a satellite TV dish, which as we know needs to be pointed in the direction of the satellite. (http: //www.viewzone.com/haarp11.html)
   At the Gakona site, high frequency transmitting antennae are located in environmentally protected domes. Thousands of antennae focus billions of watts into a pencil thin stream that is steered by computers and aimed at the sky. The following three phases help to describe how weather is modified to turn into a weapon of warfare:
   Heating: Radio waves cause the ionosphere to increase in height and to be better able to absorb and store the energy. A small area of the ionosphere is heated with HF radio waves. Billions of watts heat the ionosphere to form a bubble.
   Random pulsing: The bubble accumulates and amplifies enormous energy. Phased array systems like the one that is operational in Alaska are computer controlled and focus their powerful radio beams on the atmosphere over the target area.
   Discharge: This energy is discharged in a nuclear sized explosion on earth. Within minutes a nuclear size explosion can be snapped to earth with no radiation danger. A minimum of twelve installations in carefully chosen locations around the world will give the system the potential to attack anywhere and anytime without any warning.
   According to some scientists, the reckless use of these power levels in our natural shield—the ionosphere—could be cataclysmic. Dr Nick Begich and Jeane Manning, authors of The Military’s Pandora’s Box, quote one such scientist Paul Schaefer who says, ‘Unless we desire the death of our planet we must end the production of unstable particles which are generating the earth’s fever. A first priority to prevent this disaster would be to shut down all nuclear power plants and end the testing of atomic weapons, electronic warfare and “Star Wars”.’
   But what does the US (and presumably, also the Russian) military do? It builds its biggest ionospheric heater in Gakona, to deliberately create more instabilities in the ionosphere. After all, anything one can use his way is a weapon. Even if it leads to the death of the planet.
   ‘IF THE Americans cannot stop such hostile weather from devastating their own country, it will be naive to think they can play God to control the nature. By writing about controlling weather, Rahnuma Ahmed is giving Americans supernatural powers they cannot even dream of,’ thus concluded Mahmood Elahi in his letter, published in New Age on February 10.
   A serious allegation, indeed. It is my act of writing that is to blame, it is this which makes Americans powerful... In earlier times, those who delivered bad news were beheaded. I should surely consider myself fortunate.
   But I couldn’t help thinking, all those days and weeks spent in researching, in poring over official reports, crosschecking news items, watching videos, transcripting—all in vain. There was no need to engage, neither with what key US policymakers and high-up administration officials have written or said, such as Zbigniew Brzezinski and William Cohen. Nor with the European parliament’s concerns over HAARP. Nor the evidence advanced by a host of keen observers including reputable academics like Michel Chossudovsky.
    But before responding to Mr Elahi’s comments I would like to thank him for having read my piece, for having taken the trouble to comment. Acknowledging this, before pointing out areas of disagreement, is important.
   Elahi writes, blizzards, floods and hurricanes—the likes of some have never been seen before—have caused devastation in the US this year. Interestingly enough, this observation matches what Chossudovsky says when he writes, extreme and unusual weather patterns have ravaged not only the US, but every major region of the world over the last couple of years (‘Owning’ the weather?, Part 1, February 1). Based on a close and careful scrutiny of evidence, Chossudovsky goes on to argue that both the US and Russia have developed capabilities to ‘manipulate the World’s climate.’ That weather warfare, in all probability, has already started. That although global warming is important, it is highly unlikely that it is the one and only cause for these disturbances.
   Elahi assumes that I am writing about ‘control’ rather than ‘ownership’ (the two are separate concepts); from this mistaken assumption, he quickly dismisses the possibility that weather modification techniques exist. If they did, surely the Americans would have deployed them to prevent devastation in Washington DC, California, Nevada, Dakota, and southern California? Controlling nature is an act of God; for me to think otherwise—that human beings have devised techniques to control weather—is nothing short of naiveté.
   If careful research is countered with an incredulous disbelief based on commonsensical thinking, surely Americans, surely God... what else can I do but point out how some had insisted, many moons ago, if God had intended people to fly, He would surely have given them wings. But later, as we all know, aeroplanes were invented. People did fly. They still do. As for the ‘surely Americans’ argument, the idea that Americans are undivided, that both rulers and ruled work in concert for their common good... well, even stalwart supporters of the US regime have recently struggled exceedingly hard to maintain this myth. The federal bailout of Wall Street—according to Troubled Asset Relief Program estimates, $23.7 trillion—has led to immiseration and impoverishment of the majority, and to multi-million dollar bonuses for (failed)/bank executives. Surely ‘the’ Americans could have acted to prevent their country’s economic ruin?
   But I am not done with God. Not yet. HAARP watchers and analysts are persuaded that the idea that (only) God can control nature provides the perfect cover for HAARP. In this context, some even cite former American secretary of state Henry Kissinger’s assertion, expressed in policy documents: ‘depopulation’ should be the highest in US foreign policy priorities towards third world countries. Population increases harm US ‘national security’ interests; they need to be decreased by 50 per cent. ‘Progress... must be made,’ Kissinger asserts, in Bangladesh and in 12 other countries where ‘population moderation’ must be assisted (National Security Study Memorandum 200: Implications of Worldwide Population Growth for U.S. Security and Overseas Interests, 1974).
   To persuade sceptics, HAARP watchers argue: if what the former US secretary of defence William Cohen had said was true, that eco-terrorists can alter the climate, that they can remotely set off earthquakes and volcanoes through the use of electromagnetic waves, it is difficult to believe that the American government, more so, the American military has stayed away from developing these techniques. The US armed forces, in the words of Admiral Pier Saint-Amand quoted above, regards ‘the weather as a weapon.’
   The idea of weaponising weather was enabled through patenting technology invented by Bernard Eastlund, a physicist, in the 1980s, of which has been said, ‘when eventually disclosed, [it] will render many of Albert Einstein’s innovations obsolete.’ Eastlund’s patents have been sealed under a US Secrecy Order. His discovery involves beaming high frequency and extremely high frequency waves, of extremely high power, directly at a point on the ionosphere which becomes heated as a result of the accumulating electrical energy. One might think of it as ‘cooking’ the ionosphere.
   How does HAARP (High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program) work? The most easily understood explanation that I have come across, developed for lay persons, describes it thus: The site, officially located in Gakona, Alaska, consists of a collection of antennae, arranged in a computer-controlled grid, known as a ‘phased array’ which has the ability to focus radio signals in a precise direction, without turning the antennae. The phased array is not a radar but it uses some of the same extremely high frequencies to focus a powerful radio beam to specific locations in the Earth’s ionosphere. The latter is a highly charged layer of atmosphere (particles or ‘ions’) about 60 miles above surface which reflects shortwave radio waves. EHF waves are much shorter than short waves, they are said to propagate along the ‘line of sight’, retaining their strength over long distances, much like the antenna of a satellite TV dish, which as we know needs to be pointed in the direction of the satellite. (http: //www.viewzone.com/haarp11.html)
   At the Gakona site, high frequency transmitting antennae are located in environmentally protected domes. Thousands of antennae focus billions of watts into a pencil thin stream that is steered by computers and aimed at the sky. The following three phases help to describe how weather is modified to turn into a weapon of warfare:
   Heating: Radio waves cause the ionosphere to increase in height and to be better able to absorb and store the energy. A small area of the ionosphere is heated with HF radio waves. Billions of watts heat the ionosphere to form a bubble.
   Random pulsing: The bubble accumulates and amplifies enormous energy. Phased array systems like the one that is operational in Alaska are computer controlled and focus their powerful radio beams on the atmosphere over the target area.
   Discharge: This energy is discharged in a nuclear sized explosion on earth. Within minutes a nuclear size explosion can be snapped to earth with no radiation danger. A minimum of twelve installations in carefully chosen locations around the world will give the system the potential to attack anywhere and anytime without any warning.
   According to some scientists, the reckless use of these power levels in our natural shield—the ionosphere—could be cataclysmic. Dr Nick Begich and Jeane Manning, authors of The Military’s Pandora’s Box, quote one such scientist Paul Schaefer who says, ‘Unless we desire the death of our planet we must end the production of unstable particles which are generating the earth’s fever. A first priority to prevent this disaster would be to shut down all nuclear power plants and end the testing of atomic weapons, electronic warfare and “Star Wars”.’
   But what does the US (and presumably, also the Russian) military do? It builds its biggest ionospheric heater in Gakona, to deliberately create more instabilities in the ionosphere. After all, anything one can use his way is a weapon. Even if it leads to the death of the planet.
   more, next week